ClimsTech

Ways to start

Fixed scope. Fixed fee. A plan you own.

Four productised assessments — what you send, what we do, what you hold at the end, and what happens next. No open-ended consulting.

Cloud Cost & FinOps Audit

Engineering or finance leaders whose cloud bill has grown faster than usage — and who need to know which part is structure and which part is waste.

~2 weeks, typical

Fixed fee, agreed at a 30-minute scoping call — no day rates, no surprises.

When this is the right move: Spend rising month over month with flat traffic · No allocation by team, product or environment · A renewal or commitment decision coming up

What you send

  • Read-only billing access (or 3 months of exports)
  • Read-only monitoring/utilisation access
  • 30 minutes with whoever owns the bill

What we do

  • Utilisation-versus-provision analysis across the estate
  • Idle, oversized and unowned resource identification
  • Scheduling, tiering, Spot and commitment modelling
  • Tagging and ownership-model review

What you hold at the end

  • Cost baseline: where the money actually goes, by owner
  • Prioritised savings roadmap with risk notes per action
  • Governance recommendations that keep it down

Format

Kick-off (30 min) → async analysis → findings walkthrough (60 min) with your engineering and finance owners.

Not included

Executing the changes (separate, optional engagement) · Contract negotiation with your cloud provider

Evidence

Monthly spend 31% lower with availability preserved (verified Azure scope) Capability page

After the engagement: You own the roadmap either way — execute it with your team, or we deliver it as a fixed-scope follow-on.

Discuss this review

Kubernetes Production-Readiness Review

Teams running (or about to run) production workloads on Kubernetes who can't confidently answer: what happens at 3× traffic?

~2–3 weeks, typical

Fixed fee, agreed at a 30-minute scoping call.

When this is the right move: A launch, campaign or seasonal peak on the calendar · Latency or cost climbing with no clear cause · Scaling still involves a human mid-incident

What you send

  • Read-only cluster access (or manifests/Helm charts)
  • Recent monitoring data and one recent incident story
  • An hour with the platform owner

What we do

  • Requests-versus-usage and autoscaling-configuration review
  • Workload separation, disruption-budget and probe audit
  • Security posture: RBAC, network policy, image hygiene
  • Staged load test where access permits

What you hold at the end

  • Production-readiness report, findings ranked by risk
  • Remediation plan sequenced by effort and impact
  • Autoscaling and governance configuration recommendations as code

Format

Kick-off (45 min) → async review → findings session (90 min) with your platform and product-engineering leads.

Not included

Application code changes · Clusters we're not given visibility into

Evidence

The same review discipline validated a 120,000+ concurrent-user load scenario (CricRadio) Capability page

After the engagement: Most teams remediate the top findings with us in a follow-on sprint; some take the plan and run it internally. Both are fine.

Discuss this review

Cloud / DevOps Maturity Assessment

Leaders who've inherited or outgrown their platform and need an honest, prioritised picture before committing budget.

~3 weeks, typical

Fixed fee, agreed at a 30-minute scoping call.

When this is the right move: New engineering leadership taking stock · Delivery slowing as the team grows · Board or investor questions about platform risk

What you send

  • Architecture diagrams as they exist (imperfect is fine)
  • Access to pipelines and monitoring, or walkthroughs
  • Interviews: 3–5 engineers and leads, ~45 minutes each

What we do

  • Architecture, delivery-pipeline and environment review
  • Reliability and incident-history analysis
  • Cost-structure review
  • Maturity scoring against a stage model — where you are, what the next rung is

What you hold at the end

  • Current-state assessment across the four dimensions
  • 12-month roadmap sequenced by risk and dependency
  • A one-page executive summary you can put in front of the board

Format

Kick-off → interviews across week one → async analysis → executive readout (90 min).

Not included

Implementation (the roadmap is the deliverable) · Vendor selection exercises

Evidence

Method documented in the capability page and field notes. Capability page

After the engagement: The roadmap names the first three engagements worth doing — with us or without us.

Discuss this review

Migration Readiness Assessment

Teams facing a data-centre exit, a cloud-to-cloud move or a re-platforming — where the real blocker is that nobody trusts the dependency map.

~3 weeks, typical

Fixed fee, agreed at a 30-minute scoping call.

When this is the right move: A contract, lease or licensing deadline forcing a move · A migration 'in planning' for more than two quarters · A previous migration attempt that stalled or hurt

What you send

  • Workload inventory as it exists (spreadsheets welcome)
  • Network and integration documentation, or walkthroughs
  • Access to the people who know where the bodies are buried

What we do

  • Dependency discovery and mapping
  • Target-architecture design with decision records
  • Wave planning: grouping, sequencing, validation criteria
  • Rollback and risk analysis per wave

What you hold at the end

  • Dependency map and workload inventory
  • Target architecture with decision records
  • Staged wave plan with rollback per wave — the document a migration is actually run from

Format

Kick-off → discovery interviews and analysis → wave-plan review session (90 min) with your architecture owners.

Not included

Executing the migration (separate engagement, usually wave by wave) · Application re-architecture

Evidence

The same method moved 76 VMs and ~38 TB with under 90 minutes of cutover disruption Capability page

After the engagement: The wave plan is the backlog. Execute it with us wave by wave, or hand it to your team — it's built to survive either.

Discuss this review

Where assessments lead

Working with us beyond the first engagement

Every assessment above ends in a plan. These are the shapes the follow-on work takes — always senior-led, always handed over as code.

Cloud / DevOps assessment

A focused review of architecture, delivery and cost, with a prioritised roadmap.

Fixed-scope project

A defined migration, modernisation or automation build, delivered as code with handover.

Managed DevOps / SRE

Ongoing operation and improvement of your platform as an extension of your team.

Dedicated engineering

Senior cloud and DevOps engineers embedded with your team for sustained work.

Not sure which one fits?

Describe the symptom in one paragraph — a senior engineer will tell you which assessment applies, or whether you need one at all.

Back to capabilities

Ask which one fits